I have an ideal. Let's sue the ACLU for the pain and suffering they have caused most of the American people. How bout we start at say $100,000,000,000. or about $667.00 per person for the 150,000,000 people who are distressed by their actions. Why would this not be as fair as what they do?

W.Va. School Board Sued Over Jesus Artwork
© 2006 The Associated Press

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — Two civil liberties groups sued in federal court Wednesday to remove a picture of Jesus that has hung in a high school for more than 30 years.

Americans United for Separation of Church and State and the West Virginia American Civil Liberties Union say the painting, "Head of Christ," sends the message that Bridgeport High School endorses Christianity as its official religion.
try"

I frankly cannot understand why this school insists that it is doing nothing wrong," said the Rev. Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United. "This is pretty clear constitutional law. Public schools cannot promote specific religious ideas."

A vote by the Harrison County school board on removing the painting ended in a tie this month.
"At this point, it's a matter that's pretty much going to be up to the board," Superintendent Carl Friebel Jr. said. "It's just going to be very interesting for me to see what the board wants us to do with it."

The suit was filed on behalf of Harold Sklar and Jacqueline McKenzie, whose children attended or will attend the school.

Again I got this off Newsmax.com except the picture.

I Love This Woman!

Coulter: N.Y. Times Committed 'Treason'
Ann Coulter once said that her "only regret with [Oklahoma City bomber] Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times building."

Her acid comments about America's most influential newspaper no doubt found new meaning in the wake of the Times' decision to disclose top-secret programs the U.S. government is using to capture terrorists.

"Thanks to The New York Times, the easiest job in the world right now is: 'Head of Counterintelligence -- Al-Qaida.'" Coulter wrote Wednesday in her syndicated column. "You just have to read the New York Times over morning coffee, and you're done by 10 a.m."

Coulter was writing about what she called "the latest of a long list of formerly top-secret government antiterrorism operations that have been revealed by the Times," noting that "last week the paper printed the details of a government program tracking terrorists' financial transactions that has already led to the capture of major terrorists and their handmaidens in the U.S."

To Coulter, a lawyer, that amounted to nothing less than treason, and she wants the newspaper punished for betraying a vital antiterrorism operation meant to prevent future 9/11s.

"Maybe treason ended during the Vietnam War when Jane Fonda sat laughing and clapping on a North Vietnamese anti-aircraft gun used to shoot down American pilots," Ann recalled. "She came home and resumed her work as a big movie star without the slightest fear of facing any sort of legal sanction.

"Fast forward to today, when New York Times publisher 'Pinch' Sulzberger has just been named al-Qaida's 'Employee of the Month' for the 12th straight month.
Observing that prior to the Vietnam War, "this country took treason seriously," she charged that Americans are now being told that newspapers have a right to commit treason because of "freedom of the press."

Liberals, she wrote, invoke 'freedom of the press' like some talismanic formulation that requires us all to fall prostrate in religious ecstasy. On liberals' theory of the First Amendment, the safest place for Osama bin Laden isn't in Afghanistan or Pakistan; it's in the New York Times building."

Freedom of the press, she explained "does not mean the government cannot prosecute reporters and editors for treason -- or for any other crime. The First Amendment does not mean Times editor Bill Keller could kidnap a child and issue his ransom demands from the New York Times editorial page. He could not order a contract killing on the op-ed page. Nor can he take out a contract killing on Americans with a Page One story on a secret government program being used to track terrorists who are trying to kill Americans ...

"The federal statute on treason, 18 USC 2381, provides in relevant part: 'Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States ... adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000.'"

Citing the cases of at Ezra Pound, Mildred Gillars ("Axis Sally") and Iva Toguri D'Aquino ("Tokyo Rose") who were all charged with treason for radio broadcasts intended to demoralize the troops during World War II, Coulter wrote that the first two were were severely punished and Pound committed to a mental hospital.

"There was no evidence that in any of these cases the treasonable broadcasts ever put a single American life in danger. The law on treason doesn't require it," she wrote.

Editor's Note: Ann Coulter's book has hit the top of the bestseller lists -- get Ann Coulter's "Godless" for just $4.99 - Save $23 Go Here Now.

Try this possible ad by the New York Times on Rush's site.

Get this man elected soon!

I got this off Newsmax.com its great.

RUSH LIMBAUGH: You've gotta hear this campaign commercial. There's a man running for office as a Republican, running for Congress in North Carolina. His name is Vernon Robinson. ... I don't even want to characterize it. Just listen to this commercial.

Watch the Ad Rush is Talking About Now(or read the text of the ad andRush Limbaugh's comments first)

I say this man is a great American and he must win! And another 200 like him.

The Most Dangerous Enemy Might Live In America (the press)

It is hard for me to understand how many traitors are living in this country. How they can live here, enjoy the benefits that this country offers and still do the things they do. Why is the American Press so willing to give to our enemies the very information that can protect our citizens? And they say it is in the name of free speech.

Think about this for a moment. What would happen if one of the men or women in our military were to come by some classified information and made it available to our sworn enemy? What would happen to them?

Keep in mind that as I write this several young soldiers that have not been charged with any crime remain locked up in leg and wrist irons 24 hours a day waiting to be charged with crimes against civilians in Iraq.

But what do I hear from the talking heads? We hear that it would not be right to arrest the New York Times editors and reporters who took classified information and released it to the terrorist. Why? Because they have free speech rights.

“Well for God sakes what will it take for our justice system to take action against this treasonous bunch at the New York Times and their criminal partners the so-called(undisclosed high government officials)!”

It is time to get this crap under control before it is just too late. I say we take the bold step of arresting these traitors before they get more Americans killed. Remember it could be your family they are putting in danger.

Meet Michael Mentzer the Fond du Lac Reporter's managing editor.

Here are his comments for his column in Sunday's paper on June 25, 2006.

The Memorial Day parade in Fond du Lac ranks among the most significant and meaningful events this community has to offer. It's a time to honor the men and women who have made the ultimate sacrifice in service to the nation.

Those who sponsor the parade make it perfectly clear every year that the event is not a time to throw candy from floats, to advertise products or services, or to play politics.

It still angers me 27 days after the fact that people carrying Mark Green signs were allowed to walk in the parade along with a contingent of the Fond du Lac County Republican Party.

I have nothing against Green, a candidate for governor, or the Republican Party, but the Memorial Day parade on Fond du Lac's Main Street was not and is not the proper place to carry political signs.

I would hope that sort of thing would never again be allowed at this community's Memorial Day parade. Do it someplace else.

Now it’s my turn
The Fond du Lac County Republican Party entered the Fond du Lac Memorial Day parade as citizens of this community; we obeyed all the rules set forth by the parade organizers. So why does Mentzer slam the FDL-GOP? Why did he not jump on the parade organizers for allowing us to participate? Why did he not question the rules? Why did he not point out even one rule violation? Why does he feel he needs to try to stifle free speech? The answers are as follows:
1) The rules were not violated and he knows it.
2) He is a die-hard liberal and wants to take shots at our party for his liberal friends.
3) He did not jump on parade organizers because they are Vets and that would not look good in the paper.
4) He, like most liberals, always touts free speech of all kinds unless they don’t agree with the speech.

So ask yourself, who is trying to make political gain here? Who’s using the memory of our fallen soldiers to make a point? Who is the coward who uses his Sunday column to take pot shots at the FDL-GOP without giving us a chance to respond?

Hey, Mr. Mentzer, if you are such a supporter of our troops, where is the support for the troops in your column? Why don’t you use the column for something that will help our troops and the families of the men and women who have given their lives instead of shooting your big mouth off about something so minor?

I know you liberals can’t stand to hear this but here goes: God bless the great people of this country, God bless our troops and God bless America.

Great editorials from the FDL Reporter today.

Editorial: Flag burning

This is in response to your June 21 editorial, "We don't need law to protect Old Glory from flag burning."

Only those opposed to the will of the people see the amendment as an infringement on free speech. In fact, the amendment returns a right to the American people -- the right to protect their flag.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in 1989, by just one vote, took away from the American people the right to protect their flag by invalidating flag-protection laws in 48 states and the District of Columbia. This is a right exercised since our birth, defended by the justices on five previous Supreme Courts, and by James Madison and Thomas Jefferson, who helped adopt the first flag and write the First Amendment.

Flag desecration is conduct, not speech. One could make the argument that defacing the Washington Monument or spray-painting graffiti on the Vietnam Wall is a form of "political demonstration" but that argument would not hold water in a court of law. Or does the Veterans Defending the Bill of Rights believe the Vietnam Wall is "just another piece of granite?"

It is our hope that the entire Senate will stand up for American values and pass the flag-protection amendment.

Michael D. Buss

Flag Education program manager

American Legion Headquarters

Indianapolis, Ind.


Another great editorial

The author of this article clearly has no real understanding of what the flag truly is. It is not just a piece of cloth, but rather a symbol of the sacrifices made by brave men and women throughout our history to ensure that we can have the freedom of speech.

Freedom of speech does not have to include the defiling of this symbol. If you have an opinion, then by all means, you are within your rights to voice it. Why must it include burning a flag that represents the country I took an oath to defend and the country over 1,250,000 gave their lives up for?

If it's only "feel good legislation," so what? Let it be that way then. If you want to talk about rights, then what about the right for our fallen heroes and those wounded in service to this country? Shouldn't the right for their memories and what they fought for be protected also?

We here now have the opportunity to voice our opinions, those who have gone before us to protect that right have only the memorials and the flag for which they died to be their voice.

To burn the flag is to burn the message left to us -- that this country is so great that they laid down their lives for it. Don't burn this message; preserve it.

Chad Birkholz

Fond du Lac

Amnesty International USA is a joke.

This joke is not funny but dangerous.

Where is the outcry when the terriorists torture and murder US soldiers?

To date, not one American soldier has been taken as a P.O.W., they have all been murdered by these mindless fanatics. So where is the outcry for these deaths by the US media and Amnesty International USA?

Keep watching the drive-by media in America and see if you notice any outrage over this statement released today:

"We give the good news ... to the Islamic nation that we have carried God's verdict by slaughtering the two captured crusaders," said a statement in the name of the Mujahedeen Shura Council, which groups five insurgent organizations including al-Qaida in Iraq.

Let's see if the Dem-al-Qaida-crats like Murtha scream about these murders as they do on weak allegations about our soldiers.

After the murder and torture of two American soldiers in Iraq, here are today's headline on the Amnesty International USA website:

Reported Suicides in Guantanamo Come After Years of Arbitrary and Indefinite Detention


You think this group gives a crap about these men?

I don't think these "hate America" types ever give a wit about anyone unless they are the ememy of America.

AI-USA is based in New York. I say we should kick their butts out of the good ol' USA as traitors!

A special graduation from Fondy High School

I would like to congratulate Calvin Freiburger on his graduation from Fond du Lac High School on Thursday, June, 8th, 2006.

Calvin, at his young age, has made a name for himself within the Republican Party, his community, and around the nation. Calvin received national attention for standing tall when told he could not say "God Bless America" while giving anouncements over the PA at Fondy High. He defended his right to say these words and won.

Because of his courage, other students now know they will not have their rights trampled on. Calvin is watching...

Well Calvin, God Bless You, God Bless our Troops, God Bless America and thank you for a job well done.

Here is another example of Republicans being the real civil rights leaders.

Juneteenth, when the Republicans ended slavery
June 19, 2006


Today, Americans celebrate “Juneteenth” – when in 1865 slavery finally ended throughout the entire United States. Sadly, few people know that Juneteenth was a high water mark for African- Americans. Soon after that great day, the Democratic Party defeated the Reconstruction policies of the Republican Party, postponing the civil rights movement until the 1950s.

An important fact which most history books ignore is that Abraham Lincoln’s 1864 running mate was a Democrat, Andrew Johnson of Tennessee. And so after Lincoln’s assassination, it was a Democrat who would be President of the United States for the first four years after the Civil War. That first President Johnson did all in his power to prevent African- Americans from experiencing Lincoln’s “new birth of freedom.”

It was in Texas where slavery finally ended. On June 19, 1865, U.S. troops commanded by General Gordon Granger landed at Galveston and brought some important news that the Democrats running the state had refused to tell their slaves, that they had been legally freed more than two years before by the Emancipation Proclamation. Granger's famous General Order Number 3 read: “The people of Texas are informed that in accordance with a Proclamation from the Executive of the United States, all slaves are free. This involves an absolute equality of rights and rights of property between former masters and slaves, and the connection heretofore existing between them becomes that between employer and free laborer.”

General Granger then traveled around Texas to inform the African-Americans, still being held as slaves by their Democrat masters, that they were in fact free. Granger was a zealous advocate for full civil rights for African-Americans. Too zealous, it turned out, for President Andrew Johnson. On August 6, 1865, just seven weeks after his arrival, President Johnson relieved Granger from command in Texas. That same month, Johnson removed all African-Americans serving in the U.S. Army occupation forces.

Any officer in the U.S. Army who exerted himself too much in defense of African-Americans was out of a job. For this reason, Johnson dismissed the conscientious Phil Sheridan, who had sent General Granger to Galveston, from command in Texas and Louisiana. Sheridan’s replacement was General Winfield Hancock, who then allowed white supremacist thugs a free hand. So impressed were former rebels with the performance of Hancock that he would receive the support of the Solid South when he became the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate in 1880.

President Andrew Johnson campaigned against ratification of the 14th Amendment and vetoed the Republicans’ Civil Rights Act of 1866. It was he who quashed Republican attempts to provide “forty acres and a mule” to emancipated African-Americans. Andrew Johnson vetoed a bill to extend voting rights to African-Americans in the District of Columbia, saying he wanted a completely “white man’s government.” And in Johnson’s racist mind, the civil rights hero Frederick Douglass was “a damned scoundrel.”

Southern Democrats (the former Confederate rebels and President Johnson) exercised almost complete control over the post-Civil War South for two years after Appomattox. The Democrat state governments set up by the Andrew Johnson administration quickly reduced African-Americans to near slavery with the infamous “black codes.” Not until March 1867, when they attained two-thirds majorities in Congress, were Republicans able to override Johnson’s vetoes and enact their Reconstruction policies, beginning with the Reconstruction Act of 1867.

Unfortunately, the two-year delay before the onset of Republican Reconstruction had enabled the Democrats to strengthen their grip on power and on African-Americans in the South. As soon as they were back in power in the southern states, Democrats closed down most of the public school system that Republican administrations had established for African-Americans as well as poor whites. Democrat terrorist organizations such as the Ku Klux Klan and the Knights of the White Camellia denied African-Americans their right to vote. In the South, where dozens of African-Americans had held elective office while Republicans were in power at the state level, the restoration of Democrat rule meant the exclusion of African-Americans from politics for nearly a century.


Michael Zak is a popular speaker to Republican organizations around the country, showing office- holders, candidates, and activists how they would benefit tremendously from knowing and appreciating our Party's heritage of civil rights achievement. His book, Back to Basics for the Republican Party, is the acclaimed history of the GOP from the civil rights perspective.
Contact Mr. Zak to invite him to speak at your Republican event.


Michael Zak’s article is adapted from his book Back to Basics for the Republican Party, a history of the GOP from the civil rights perspective. His e-mail address is Grand_Old_Partisan@hotmail.com.
Contact Michael Zak (Grand_Old_Partisan@hotmail.com) to invite him to speak at Republican events throughout the country.


Contact Mr. Zak to invite him to speak at your Republican event. Click here for more information
Join our mailing list!

Give Kate a hand.

I am so sick of these people who believe that there is no baby until the baby is completely out of the of the womb and for some of these nuts it's still not a baby until the mother or her doctor says it is. Maybe in 30 days it will be a baby. Ask Russ Fiengold.

Kate at An Ol' Broad's Ramblings has one going on her blog about this. Tune in and help her out.

Click here and I'll take you there.

Today is a sad day for the Amercian media and the Democrats. Their freedom fighter in Iraq is dead!





A small picture of a small man

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - U.S. aircraft killed al Qaeda leader in Iraq Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the insurgent leader who masterminded the death of hundreds in suicide bombings and was blamed for the videotaped beheading of foreign captives.

Now ask yourself, how will the press take this great victory and turn it into a defeat?

Do you think Zarqawi has found out that there are no 72 virgins yet?

God Bless our troops and God Bless America

This is a great read. We need as many people to see this as we can.

TUESDAY, June 6, 2006, 7:08 p.m.

HOW THE MEDIA WOULD HAVE REPORTED D-DAY TODAY(Via: Neal Boortz) and (Charlie Sykes)

by William A. Mayer

Tragic French Offensive Stalled on Beaches

(Normandy, France - June 6, 1944) - Pandemonium, shock and sheer terror predominate today's events in Europe.

In an as yet unfolding apparent fiasco, Supreme Allied Commander, Gen. Dwight David Eisenhower's troops got a rude awakening this morning at Omaha Beach here in Normandy.

Due to insufficient planning and lack of a workable entrance strategy, soldiers of the 1st and 29th Infantry as well as Army Rangers are now bogged down and sustaining heavy casualties inflicted on them by dug-in insurgent positions located 170 feet above them on cliffs overlooking the beaches which now resemble blood soaked killing fields at the time of this mid-morning filing.

Bodies, parts of bodies, and blood are the order of the day here, the screams of the dying and the stillness of the dead mingle in testament to this terrible event.

Morale can only be described as extremely poor--in some companies all the officers have been either killed or incapacitated, leaving only poorly trained privates to fend for themselves.

Things appear to be going so poorly that Lt. General Omar Bradley has been rumored to be considering breaking off the attack entirely. As we go to press embattled U.S. president Franklin Delano Roosevelt'sspokesman has not made himself available for comment at all, fueling fires that something has gone disastrously awry.

The government at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue is in a distinct lock-down mode and the Vice President's location is presently and officially undisclosed.

Whether the second in command should have gone into hiding during such a crisis will have to be answered at some future time, but many agree it does not send a good signal.

Miles behind the beaches and adding to the chaos, U.S. Naval gunships have inflicted many friendly fire casualties, as huge high explosive projectiles rain death and destruction on unsuspecting Allied positions.The lack of training of Naval gunners has been called into question numerous times before and today's demonstration seems to underlie those concerns.

At Utah Beach the situation is also grim, elements of the 82nd and 101st Airborne seemed to be in disarray as they missed their primary drop zones behind the area believed to comprise the militant's front lines. Errant paratroopers have been hung up in trees, breaking arms and legs, rendering themselves easy targets for those defending this territory.

On the beach front itself the landing area was missed, catapulting U.S. forces nearly 2,000 yards South of the intended coordinates, thus placing them that much farther away from the German insurgents and unable to direct covering fire or materially add to the operation.

Casualties at day's end are nothing short of horrific; at least 8,000 and possibly as many as 9,000 were wounded in the haphazardly coordinated attack, which seems to have no unifying purpose or intent. Of this number at least 3,000 have been estimated as having been killed, making June 6th by far, the worst single day of the war which has dragged on now--with no exit strategy in sight--as the American economy still struggles to recover from Herbert Hoover's depression and its 25% unemployment.

Military spending has skyrocketed the national debt into uncharted regions, lending another cause for concern. When and if the current hostilities finally end it may take generations for the huge debt to be repaid.

On the planning end of things, experts wonder privately if enough troops were committed to the initial offensive and whether at least another 100,000 troops should have been added to the force structure before such an audacious undertaking. Communication problems also have made their presence felt making that an area for further investigation by the appropriate governmental committees.

On the home front, questions and concern have been voiced. A telephone poll has shown dwindling support for the wheel-chair bound Commander In Chief, which might indicate a further erosion of support for his now three year-old global war.

Of course, the President's precarious health has always been a question. He has just recently recovered from pneumonia and speculation persists whether or not he has sufficient stamina to properly sustain the war effort. This remains a topic of furious discussion among those questioning his competency.

Today's costly and chaotic landing compounds the President's already large credibility problem.

More darkly, this phase of the war, commencing less than six months before the next general election, gives some the impression that Roosevelt may be using this offensive simply as a means to secure re-election in the fall.

Underlining the less than effective Allied attack, German casualties--most of them innocent and hapless conscripts--seem not to be as severe as would be imagined. A German minister who requested anonymity stated categorically that "the aggressors were being driven back into the sea amidst heavy casualties, the German people seek no wider war."

"The news couldn't be better," Adolph Hitler said when he was first informed of the D-Day assault earlier this afternoon."

As long as they were in Britain we couldn't get at them. Now we have them where we can destroy them."

German minister Goebbels had been told of the Allied airborne landings at 0400 hours.

"Thank God, at last," he said. "This is the final round."

Now my comment: Thank God for our brave troops then and now and thank God the press in WWII wasn't as stupid as they are today! To think of all the young men who died to give us the freedom we have today and how these nuts abuse it.
God Bless America

Maybe the Canadians will understand that it is not just the USA they hate.

17 Terror Suspects Arrested in TorontoJun 03 11:09 AM US/Eastern

By BETH DUFF-BROWNAssociated Press Writer
TORONTO
Seventeen Canadian residents were in custody Saturday on terrorism- related charges, including plots to use explosives in attacks on Canadian soil, authorities said.
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police said they arrested 12 male adults and five youth and foiled plans for terrorist attacks against targets in southern Ontario.

Officials showed evidence of bomb making materials, a computer hard drive, camouflage uniforms and what appears to be a door with bullet holes in it at a news conference Saturday morning.
"This group took steps to acquire three tons of ammonium nitrate and other components necessary to create explosive devices," said assistant Royal Canadian Mounted Police commissioner Mike McDonell said.
McDonell said that is three times the amount used to blow up the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.
The arrests were made Friday, with some 400 officers involved.
McDonell said the suspects were either citizens or residents of Canada and had trained together.
"The men arrested yesterday are Canadian residents from a variety of backgrounds. For various reasons they appeared to have become adherents of a violent ideology inspired by al-Qaida," said Luc Portelance, the assistant director of operations with CSIS _ Canada's spy agency.
Heavily armed police officers ringed the Durham Regional Police Station in the city of Pickering, just east of Toronto, as the suspects were brought in late Friday night in unmarked cars which were drove into an underground garage.
The Toronto Star reported Saturday that Canadian youths in their teens and 20s, upset at the treatment of Muslims worldwide, were among those arrested.
The newspaper said they had trained at a camp north of Toronto and had plotted to attack CSIS's downtown office near the CN Tower, among other targets.
Melisa Leclerc, a spokeswoman for the federal Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day, had no comment on the arrests.
In March 2004, Ottawa software developer Mohammad Momin Khawaja became the first Canadian charged under the country's Anti-Terrorism Act for alleged activities in Ottawa and London. Khawaja was also named, but not charged, in British for playing a role in a foiled bomb plot. He is being held in an Ottawa detention center, awaiting trial.
The Canadian anti-terrorism law was passed swiftly following the Sept. 11 assaults, particularly after Osama bin-Laden's named Canada one of five so-called Christian nations that should be targeted for acts of terror. The others, reaffirmed in 2004 by his al-Qaida network, were the United States, Britain, Spain and Australian, all of which have been victims of terrorist attacks.
The anti-terrorism law permits the government to brand individuals and organizations as terrorists and gives police the power to make preventive arrests of people suspected of planning a terrorist attack.
Though many view Canada as an unassuming neutral nation that has skirted terrorist attacks, it has suffered its share of aggression, including the 1985 Air India bombing, in which 329 people were killed, most of them Canadian citizens.
Intelligence officials believe at least 50 terror groups now have some presence in the North American nation and have long complained that the country's immigration laws and border security are too weak to weed out potential terrorists.

Dump Doyle!

On my block we believe in getting our garbage out early. Isn't it interesting that our garbage dumpsters are GREEN.


Vote Mark Green for Governor

People get use to this picture because you will be seeing it a lot when Mark Green becomes the next Governor of Wisconsin!


Green Campaign: Green Accepts Endorsement of Milwaukee Police Association6/1/2006